In re Roemer

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

On September 15, 1993, this Court published a per curiam opinion in this case, finding misconduct and imposing a ninety (90) day suspension from the practice of law. 620 N.E.2d 694. Thereafter, the Disciplinary Commission filed a “Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment”, calling to our attention two errors of fact: (1) that the year of Respondent’s admission to the practice of law is 1955, and (2) that Respondent had been reprimanded previously.

We note that the record presented in this case did not contain a reference to prior disciplinary actions against Respondent. However,…