Legal Opinion

Bruxey v. Burke

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to strike cause from calendar, and counter motion to amend nunc pro tunc.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

This is a motion' to strike the cause from the calendar for the plaintiff’s failure to serve a notice of trial until some 19 months after he had filed his note of issue herein. The plaintiff, on the other hand, makes a counter motion to amend the note of issue nunc pro tunc as for the November term of 1897, and to have the cause advanced on the calendar.

The defendants’ motion is well taken. The cases of Gowing v. Levy (Sup.) 17 N. Y. Supp. 771, and National Carbonating Co. v. Standard Aerating Co. (Sup.) 47 N. Y. Supp. 1016, have established the rule in this department that a note of issue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gowing v. LevyNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Yates v. McAdamNew York Supreme Court · 1896
  3. National Carbonating Co. v. Standard Aerating Co.New York Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. SeamanNew York Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API