Legal Opinion

Schmitz v. Schmitz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1998No. Civil 980056PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Orell Schmitz appeals from an amended divorce decree modifying his spousal support obligation payable to Ann Schmitz. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

[¶ 2] Ann and Orell Schmitz were married on April 13, 1974. The original judgment decreeing their divorce was entered on June 15, 1993. The judgment established Orell Schmitz’s spousal support obligation at $800 per month for five years, with the district court retaining jurisdiction over spousal support.

[¶ 3] On August 13, 1997, Ann Schmitz moved to amend the judgment. In December 1997, the district court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Van Oosting v. Van OostingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Reinecke v. GriffethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Alvarez v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Van Klootwyk v. Van KlootwykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fox v. FoxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Greenwood v. GreenwoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Holtz v. HoltzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Richter v. HouserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Jorgenson v. RatajczakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API