State v. Burkholder
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentHolmes, J.
While the defendant is entitled to certain procedural due process rights at a probation revocation hearing, in my view he is not entitled to the benefits of the exclusionary rule. Therefore, I dissent.
The revocation of probation is not recognized as a part of a criminal prosecution. Thus, the alleged violator is not entitled to all of the constitutional guarantees available to one who stands charged with a criminal offense. Gagnon v. Scarpelli (1973), 411 U.S. 778 [71 O.O.2d 279]; Morrissey v. Brewer (1972), 408 U.S. 471. Based on this premise, the vast majority of reported cases have held…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- United States of America Ex Rel. Herbert Sperling, Relator-Appellant v. Walter v. Fitzpatrick, Warden, West Street House of DetentionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.