Legal Opinion
State v. Matthews
Nebraska Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 1999No. A-98-055PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Inbody, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Michael Anthony Matthews appeals his convictions for two counts of robbery, arguing that (1) the district court erred in overruling his motion to suppress, (2) the district court erred in overruling his motion for a change of venue, (3) he received ineffective assistance of counsel, (4) the evidence was insuffi cient to support his convictions, and (5) the trial court erred in denying his oral motion to continue the trial. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
On September 12, 1996, between 7 and 7:30 p.m., 74-year-old Vera Moss was…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RelfordNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. MalcomNebraska Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. RungeNebraska Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. DavidsonNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000