Legal Opinion · Dissent

Succession of Linder

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 2012No. 11-CA-633Published

1DissentEdwards, C.J.

|,I dissent from the opinion in this matter because I believe that Mr. Leo Guen-ther breached his fiduciary duty to Mrs. Rosenthal and that his conflict of interest and mismanagement was sufficient to warrant his removal as succession representative. Therefore, I find the trial court erred in relying on the appraisals presented by Mr. Guenther’s expert witness.

I agree with the majority opinion that a legatee may serve as the executor of the estate and that a mere conflict of interest of itself does not warrant removal in the absence of mismanagement. However, I also note that an executor of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Canovsky v. GehrsenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Succession of LinderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API