People v. Bridges

Defendant and appellant was accused by information of the crime of burglary; nine counts were alleged. Pound guilty by a jury of all counts, defendant appeals from the judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial.

It is urged on appeal that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment and that the admission of certain evi denee was prejudicial error. With regard to the first mentioned contention it is argued that the testimony of an accomplice, upon which the prosecution relies, is not sufficiently corroborated. Briefly, the record reveals that one Jack Just-man who was jointly…