Legal Opinion · Dissent

DaCosse v. Ahrens

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 3, 1981No. CA 80-457Published

1DissentDonald L. Corbin, Judge

I must respectfully dissent to the majority opinion. To pursue the reasoning of the majority in the instant case requires remarkable imagination or an exercise in mental gymnastics that is mind-boggling to behold.

The learned trial court seemed to preface his remarks with an indication that John DaCosse would have been successful in his original divorce action. This was never litigated because of the reconciliation of the parties. One cannot speculate on the success or failure of this litigation. The trial court viewed this reconciliation agreement as a two-phase agreement, the first phase…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loveless v. DiehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Little Rock Municipal Airport Commission v. Arkansas Valley Compress & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Johnson v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API