Legal Opinion

Insurance Co. of North America v. Gish, Brook & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 1909No. 272PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Caddo County; Frank M. Bailey, r Judge. Action by Gish, Brook & Co. against the Insurance Company of North America. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

This is a proceeding in error from a judgment of the district court of Caddo county in an action in which M. N. Gish, T. H. Brook, and G. W. Baker, a partnership, doing business under the firm name and style of Gish, Brook & Co., were plaintiffs, and plaintiff in error was defendant. Defendants in error have filed in this proceeding a motion to dismiss upon the same grounds as was presented in the motion to dismiss in the action of Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Gish, Brook & Co. (decided at this term of court), ante, p. 830, 102 Pae. 708. The same propositions are presented…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. Gish, Brook & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API