Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Austin v. Hendrick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1970No. Appeal, 395PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Relator-appellant Austin was charged with murder. At the preliminary hearing, his counsel cross-examined the Commonwealth’s only witness and elicited the information that the witness had given written statements to the Commonwealth. Defense counsel requested the production of these statements and the hearing Judge so ordered. However, the Assistant District Attorney refused to produce the statements, and thereafter the hearing Judge, without enforcing his aforesaid Order, held relator for action of the Grand Jury.

A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KilgallenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth v. ByrdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Commonwealth v. PollickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. DiDio v. BaldiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LoarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. LindsleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. SchroeckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. BoswellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Thompson v. HendrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API