Legal Opinion

Niagara Hudson Power Corp. v. Leventritt

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 15, 1951No. 211Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

340 U.S. 336 (1951)

NIAGARA HUDSON POWER CORP.

v.

LEVENTRITT.

No. 211.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued December 5, 1950.

Decided January 15, 1951.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.[*]

Randall J. LeBoeuf, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner in No. 211. With him on the brief were Craigh Leonard and Lauman Martin.

Roger S. Foster argued the cause for petitioner in No. 212. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman and John F. Davis.

T. Roland Berner and M. Victor Leventritt argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief was Aaron Lewittes.

2Opinion of the Court · BurtonJustice Burton

The…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du BoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Group of Institutional Investors v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co., and 9 Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Otis & Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Niagara Hudson Power Corp. v. LeventrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API