Eena Co. v. Zosel
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRand, C. J.
In this suit, the appellants have twice appealed and the respondents now move to dismiss both appeals. The first was from what is now claimed to have been a decree entered on November 15,1938. The other was from a decree which was actually made and entered on June 20, 1939. The ground urged for the dismissal of the first5 appeal is that the transcript on appeal was not filed in this court within the time limited by subdivision 2 of section 7-507, Oregon Code 1930. Valid orders extending the time for filing the transcript to and including July 5, 1939, were made. A further order extending the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Dlouhy v. Simpson Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Dent v. DolanOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Eena Co. v. ZoselOregon Supreme Court · 1940
- Gearhart v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Gearhart v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989