Legal Opinion

InMode Ltd. v. BTL Industries, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 27, 2025No. 1:24-cv-12955Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ___________________________________ ) INMODE LTD., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action ) No. 24-cv-12955-PBS BTL INDUSTRIES, INC. d/b/a BTL ) AESTHETICS, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER March 27, 2025 Saris, D.J. Plaintiff InMode Ltd. (“InMode”) has sued BTL Industries, Inc. (“BTL”) for infringement of

U.S. Patent No. 8,961,511

(“the ’511 patent”). Six months after InMode filed suit, BTL filed a petition for inter partes review (“IPR”) with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”). On October 2, 2024, the PTAB instituted IPR on all claims of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Virtualagility Inc. v. salesforce.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Murata MacHinery USA, Inc. v. Daifuku Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Amerlux, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  4. Aplix IP Holdings Corp. v. Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API