Legal Opinion

Coburn v. New Telephone Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1901No. 18,853PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

The appellant is the owner of a lot of land in the city of Indianapolis abutting on Delaware street forty-five feet and on New York street 125 feet. Both of these streets are public streets of said city, each ninety feet wide, and twenty-five feet on each side of New York street has been set apart and improved as sidewalks. Appellant also owns, subject to the public easement thereon for street purposes, so much of each of said public streets.as lies opposite and adjacent to the front and side of his said lot to the middle of each of said streets. At present his lot has no improvements…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BerdettaIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Julia Building Ass'n v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  3. Magee v. OvershinerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Chicago & Calumet Terminal Railway Co. v. Whiting, Hammond & East Chicago Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mordhurst v. Ft. Wayne & Southwestern Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. McCann v. Johnson County Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Fox v. Ohio Valley Gas Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Oliver v. CoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Hall v. BreyfogleIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API