Baker v. Brill
New York Supreme Court
IN ERROR, on certiorari to a justice’s court. The defendant in error brought an action in the court below against the plain tiff in error, for his expenses in going Dutchess county to New-York, in obedience to a sub issued out of the mayor’s court of the city of New-York, on the behalf of the defendant below. The service . of the subpeena was proved, and the plaintiff below also proved, by paroi, that he attended the court, and was examined as a witness in the cause.
Read the full summary
IN ERROR, on certiorari to a justice’s court. The defendant in error brought an action in the court below against the plain tiff in error, for his expenses in going Dutchess county to New-York, in obedience to a sub issued out of the mayor’s court of the city of New-York, on the behalf of the defendant below. The service . of the subpeena was proved, and the plaintiff below also proved, by paroi, that he attended the court, and was examined as a witness in the cause. The defendant below in 1 sisted that these facts could only be proved by producing the record or minutes of the court, and not…
1Per curiam
The justice properly admitted paroi evidence. and the judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Gunnison v. GunnisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1860