Legal Opinion

State v. Gibson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2019No. 17AP-200PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSadler, J.

*871{¶ 1} This case arises from an appeal by defendant-appellant, Daniel R. Gibson, from a decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to correct an alleged error in jail-time credit filed pursuant to R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(g)(iii). In his appeal, Gibson set forth a single assignment of error as follows:

The trial court abused its discretion and denied Daniel Gibson Due Process and Equal Protection of the law when it failed to consider the merits of his motion for jail-time credit, in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Thompson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. State v. GuiterresOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. CrispOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State v. AugustineOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API