Bielec Wrecking & Lumber Co. v. McMorran
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The petitioner-respondent will be referred to hereafter as the petitioner and the respondent-appellant will be denominated the Superintendent. The facts giving rise to the litigation may be stated briefly. The Department of Public Works advertised for bids for the demolition of 83 structures prior to the letting of a main highway construction contract. The specifications contained the usual reservation of the right to reject all bids. Item 76M in the proposal was for “Maintenance and Protection of Traffic ”. In the estimates this item was marked “ omitted by intent ”, an ambiguous phrase…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Washington Moving & Storage Co. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Lovisa Construction Co. v. New York State Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Noel J. Brunell & Son, Inc. v. Town of ChamplainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Electronics Unlimited, Inc. v. Village of BurnsvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- La Barge Brothers Co. v. Town of CiceroNew York Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.