United States v. O'Connell
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
Upon trial to a jury the four appellants were convicted under an indictment which charged them with conspiring to violate section 409 of Title 18 U.S.C.A. The statute in effect during the alleged conspiracy provided, in so far as relevant, that “whoever shall steal or shall unlawfully take by any fraudulent device, scheme, or game, from any * * * dining car * * * when such car is a part of a train moving from one State * * * to another State * * * any money * * * ” shall be fined or imprisoned or both.1 The appellants were members of the crew of a dining car operated in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. StafoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of New York v. Village of LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- United States v. De NormandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. GilboyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- R. B. Boone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Felix PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Rutilio Lorenzo Petti, A/K/A Thomas GrassoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.