Legal Opinion
Rodney Kiemele Lillian Kiemele v. Soo Line Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 1, 1996No. 95-3700Published
1Opinion of the Court
93 F.3d 472
Rodney KIEMELE; Lillian Kiemele, Plaintiffs--Appellants
v.
SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant--Appellee
No. 95-3700.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted June 10, 1996.
Decided Aug. 20, 1996.
Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing
En Banc Denied Oct. 1, 1996.*
Dann Greenwood, Dickinson, North Dakota, argued, for appellant.
Stephen William Plambeck, Fargo, North Dakota, argued (Adele Hedley Page, on the brief), for appellee.
Before BEAM and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,* Senior District Judge.
BOGUE, Senior District Judge.
Rodney and Lillian Kiemele appeal the district…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gerald L. ALLEN, Appellant, v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.