Florida Citrus Commission v. Griffin
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
McNULTY, Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal appellants seek to review the trial court’s denial of several motions to quash certain witness subpoenas. It is stipulated that the order appealed from was dictated into the record by the trial judge but that no order or other writing, conforming to the trial judge’s oral ruling, was signed by the judge.
Under the foregoing circumstances the order appealed from is a non-appealable order and therefore this appeal must be dismissed.1 In Egantoff v. Herring2 this court held that a judgment, decision, order or decree is not rendered until “such has been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Egantoff v. HerringDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Herring v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Braren v. LAWYERS'REALTY ABSTRACT CO. OF SARASOTADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Perez v. City of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- STATE, DEPARTMENT OF CITRUS v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Matthews v. Stefan M. Stein, P. A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- State v. MaldonadoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- State v. SimpsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- McDermott v. City of ClearwaterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.