Legal Opinion

Flannagan v. Clark

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1950No. 17214PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts).

Headnotes 1 to 4 require no elaboration.

By the first ground of the amended motion, error is alleged on the following charge: “She prays the relief of the court, that the contract be rescinded, and that she recover of the defendant the sum of money she alleged she paid, and that the security deed and the notes given by her be canceled.” The petition did not specifically pray that the contract be rescinded. It is asserted that so charging the jury was prejudicial to the defendant. She alleged and proved that she was induced to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Teasley v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. McBride v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Jones v. HogansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Benson v. MaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  5. Hening & Hagedorn v. GlantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lakeside Investments Group, Inc. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. CHARTER MORTGAGE COMPANY v. AhouseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Gignilliat v. BorgCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Spiva v. Union CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Morgan v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API