Legal Opinion

Miller v. Keyser

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 2002No. 01-0541PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Enoch

Under the Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act (“DTPA”), 1 we are asked whether an agent for a disclosed principal may be held liable for passing along false representations made in the course and scope of his employment. The court of appeals answered that question no. 2 To the contrary, we hold that because the DTPA allows a consumer to bring suit against “any person,” 3 an agent may be held personally liable for the misrepresentations he makes when acting within the scope of his employment. As a result, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment, and remand this cause to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Leyendecker & Associates, Inc. v. WechterTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Eagle Properties, Ltd. v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Franka v. VelasquezTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re Merrill Lynch Trust Co. FSBTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Ninety Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars & No Cents in United States Currency ($90,235)Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Wright v. Sage Engineering, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  5. Khan v. GBAK Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API