Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Diaz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1993Published

1Dissent

Simons and Bellacosa, JJ.

(dissenting). We conclude that the seizure of drugs from defendant’s pocket was a search incident to arrest and therefore it was valid even in the absence of a warrant. Accordingly, we dissent.

As the majority concludes, defendant was lawfully subjected to a Terry frisk by the police. During that frisk, the officer felt what he believed to be drug vials. The officer then proceeded to search defendant’s pocket, discover the drugs and arrest defendant. The sole question presented is whether the intrusion into defendant’s pocket in the circumstances of this case falls…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. BrockingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API