Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Chicago Great Western Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 29, 1922No. Gen. No. 27,103PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Plaintiff brought suit against the Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Bailway Company and the Chicago Great Western Bailroad Company to recover damages for personal injuries. Afterwards he dismissed the suit as to the Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Company and filed an amended declaration against the other defendant. A demurrer to the amended declaration was sustained and the suit dismissed, to reverse which plaintiff prosecutes this appeal. The only question to be decided, therefore, is did the amended declaration state a cause of action.

Plaintiff’s position is that the amended declaration states a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Hull v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Staley v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. WagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McDonald's Corp. v. LevineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Church v. AdlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  3. McDonald's Corp. v. LevineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API