Stoddard v. Montgomery
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.
The object of this action was the partition of the real estate described in the record. The original petition did not accurately allege the shares of the owners of the real estate or the existence of an encumbrance on a part of the land as found and confirmed by the judgment of the trial court. Shirley Gemar, a defendant in the case, the owner of one-sixtieth of the real estate, by answer filed in the action correctly alleged the shares of the owners of the land as they existed and as they were found and confirmed by the judgment of the district court; alleged the names of the persons who…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Des Moines Joint Stock Land Bank v. NordholmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Jones v. HolzapfelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- Excise Board of Tulsa County v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Johnson v. EmerickNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Mabry v. MuddNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schmeckpeper v. Panhandle Cooperative Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
- Evans v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- Stoddard v. MontgomeryNebraska Supreme Court · 1959