Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Perry

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 8, 1993No. 92-P-432PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

The defendant, Cheryl L. Perry, was indicted by a grand jury for involuntary manslaughter, G. L. c. 265, §13, and illegal possession of a hypodermic needle, G. L. c. 94C, § 27. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss each charge on the ground, that the evidence presented to the grand jury was insufficient in regard to the two offenses. See Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 385 Mass. 160, 163 (1982). The motion was apparently allowed as to both charges. The Commonwealth appeals, claiming that the judge erred in finding that there was “not sufficient evidence that the de*128fendant engaged in wanton or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WelanskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. VanderpoolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. CatalinaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. People v. Cruciani, New York County Courts1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VaughnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. HamiltonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. CarrilloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  5. Commonwealth v. LouisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API