United States v. Swapp
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JENKINS, Chief Judge.
When sentence was first imposed in this matter, the Sentencing Guidelines had been struck down as unconstitutional by an en banc opinion of this court. 1 While this issue was on appeal from this court the Supreme Court spoke in United States v. Mistretta, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989), and upheld the Sentencing Guidelines as Constitutional. The Tenth Circuit in light of Mistretta remanded this matter for re-sentencing under the guidelines. 868 F.2d 1201. An amended presentence report was prepared for each defendant and discussed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Ryan, JeremiahCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Manuel OteroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Luis Fernando Correa-VargasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Greg LanziCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. QuigleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993