Brooks v. Goldhammer
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Ethel L. Brooks, administratrix of the estate of Mary Kate Lucy, deceased, sued Dr. Richard Goldhammer, James Royals,1 and Dr. Robert Fortier-Benson, alleging that they had negligently and wantonly managed, monitored, and/or administered the induction of general anesthesia to Ms. Lucy during an attempted surgical procedure in July 1987, and that their negligence had proximately caused Ms. Lucy's death. Dr. Goldhammer, Royals, and Dr. Fortier-Benson filed motions for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. Brooks appeals only from the judgment for Dr. Goldhammer. We affirm.
Viewing the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blumberg v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Bradford v. McGeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Bates v. MeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
3Cited by10 opinions
- Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Barton v. American Red CrossDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1993
- Rudolph v. LindsaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Mixon v. CasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Schuffert v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.