Legal Opinion
Niebla, By and Through Niebla v. County of San Diego
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 23, 1992No. 90-56302UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
967 F.2d 589
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Angelica NIEBLA, By and Through her Guardian ad Litem,
Marcelino NIEBLA; Marcelino Niebla, an
individual; Maria Niebla, an
individual, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-56302.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 7, 1991.
Decided June 23, 1992.
Before SNEED,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Novak v. Cobb County-Kennestone Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994