Legal Opinion
Fourth National Bank v. Lattimore
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 17, 1929No. 6742PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The first headnote is a quotation from the Civil Code (1910), § 5471. It appears from the petition that two named persons appeared in Macon with the note and check, and that they indorsed the name of the payee thereon, either with or without authority, and discounted the note at the bank. The check was cashed at a Macon hotel, and in due course was paid by the bank; so that both the note and the check came into possession of the bank apparently with the indorsement of the payee on them. The check was charged against the plaintiff’s account, and the bank…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bruce v. Neal BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Farris v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Carter v. HaralsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Herring v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Ball v. MaddenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richardson v. C. I. T. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Austell Bank v. National Bondholders Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Davis v. National City BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Berger v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Lancaster v. RalstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.