Legal Opinion

$23,811.00 IN US CURRENCY v. Kowalski

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided January 12, 1993No. 92-0171LCPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM RULING

TRIMBLE, District Judge.

Now before the court for its consideration is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment in the above-captioned matter. Plaintiffs seek summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in that as a matter of law defendant Kowalski’s warrantless search and seizure of the plaintiffs and their property was without probable cause and/or a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts and as such offended plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment Constitutional guarantees. Kowalski responds that there are genuine issues of material fact…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. ShortLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. State v. SneedLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. State v. CurtisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. State v. EllingtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. State v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API