Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Paramount Oil & Gas Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1923No. 1478PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHarper, C. J.

Appellants brought this, suit against appellees for $6,425, balance due for labor performed, and for cause of action alleged:

That February 5, .1921, they entered into a. written contract with defendants to drill,. clean, and swab an oil well for $85 per day; that they did 47 days’ work under it.

That they performed 32 days’ labor at instance and request of the defendants at the agreed price of $75 per day on defendants’ leases.

That the aggregate amounts earned under these two items was $6,295; that $2,670 of this sum was paid.

That under contract they performed 36 days’ labor between May 17 and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. First Nat. Bank of ChesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Barthold v. ThomasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  3. Edmonds v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Bischoff v. AldersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCaskill v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API