Legal Opinion
Hastings v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 7, 1994No. A93A2262PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
David Mark Hastings pled guilty to a charge of being a habitual violator, OCGA § 40-5-58, and properly reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. See Mims v. State, 201 Ga. App. 277, 278-279 (1) (410 SE2d 824) (1991).
In his sole enumeration of error, Hastings contends the trial court erred in denying his motion because the evidence supporting the charge was obtained in an illegal stop and arrest.
The evidence presented at the hearing on the motion to suppress showed that on June 28, 1992, shortly after coming on duty at midnight, Deputy James Reed of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- City of Winterville v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Delong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Horton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. HerediaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Hernandez-Lopez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Amber C. Maughon v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Page v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- State v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.