Legal Opinion

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Hammac

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 1, 1972No. 1 Div. 48PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADLEY, Judge.

The appeal is from a judgment in the amount of $8,000 awarded in favor of appellee for the negligence of appellant in producing and bottling a Coca Cola which exploded and injured appellee. A plea of the general issue was filed and a jury trial ensued resulting in a judgment for appellee.

During the empaneling of the jury appellee was allowed to challenge for cause a prospective juror on the ground that said prospective juror had been acquainted with *63one of appellant’s lawyers for about twenty years. Upon being asked by the court if such acquaintance would, in any way, interfere…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Brown v. WoolvertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Calhoun v. Hannan & MichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Pace v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clayton Ex Rel. Clayton v. FargasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. BattisteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Jeffries v. LoftinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API