Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Hammac
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BRADLEY, Judge.
The appeal is from a judgment in the amount of $8,000 awarded in favor of appellee for the negligence of appellant in producing and bottling a Coca Cola which exploded and injured appellee. A plea of the general issue was filed and a jury trial ensued resulting in a judgment for appellee.
During the empaneling of the jury appellee was allowed to challenge for cause a prospective juror on the ground that said prospective juror had been acquainted with *63one of appellant’s lawyers for about twenty years. Upon being asked by the court if such acquaintance would, in any way, interfere…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Brown v. WoolvertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Calhoun v. Hannan & MichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Pace v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clayton Ex Rel. Clayton v. FargasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. BattisteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Jeffries v. LoftinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978