Legal Opinion

Damutz v. William Pinchbeck, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 23, 1946No. 102, Docket 20352PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff was employed by the defendant to fire the boilers used in its wholesale floral business at Guilford, Conn. Steam from these boilers supplies the heat for two greenhouses and is also used to sterilize the soil in which the plants are grown indoors. The plaintiff, who brought this suit to recover compensation for overtime alleged to be due him under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201, ff, is con-cededly entitled to recover unless he is, as the defendant contends an exempt employee under § 13(a) (6). This section expressly provides that those…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walling v. RocklinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dost v. Pevely Dairy CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, and Cross-Appellee v. Jackson & Perkins Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Harold Adkins v. Mid-American Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Adkins v. Mid-America Growers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  5. Waialua Agricultural Co., Limited v. ManejaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API