Legal Opinion

Johnson, Daniels & Co. v. County of Polk

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1887Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Raney

The appellee moves in each of these cases to docket and dismiss on the ground that no assignment of errors has been filed, and the further ground that appellant has not complied with Rule 21 which requires of the appellant a deposit of $15, or security by bond, or recognizance, for payment of the Clerk’s costs. There is in each transcript a formal assignment of errors, which counsel for appellee overlooked, doubtless because such assignments are ordinarily filed in civil cases separately from the transcript. This ground is therefore not tenable.

The authority of the court to make Rule 21 was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Selma and Meridian Railroad Company v. Louisiana National Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Thomas D. Owings, in Error v. Luke Tiernan's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  3. Van Rensselaer v. Watts's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API