Legal Opinion

Coppola v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 5, 1996No. 95 Civ. 4995 (JSR)Published

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

RAKOFF, District Judge.

Having already received a windfall of nearly a half million dollars as a result of errors by the Internal Revenue Service, convicted tax felon Emilio Coppola seeks refund of an additional $24,059.75 on the basis of what he alleges were IRS mistakes. The cause was tried to the Court on May 13, 1996. While the evidence suggests that the IRS may be entitled to a gold medal for bungling, it fails to support Mr. Coppola’s instant claim. More particularly, the Court hereby makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Findin…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Juana Estela Corniel-Rodriguez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Saboet Elmazi Azizi and Feim Azizi v. Richard L. Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. Lillian Goldberg v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. Tonkonogy v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API