Legal Opinion

In Re Application of Conrad Smith for Access to Grand Jury Proceeding Materials in United States v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 18, 2025No. Misc. No. 2024-0165Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE APPLICATION OF CONRAD SMITH, ET AL. FOR ACCESS TO Misc. Case No. 24-165 (JEB) GRAND JURY PROCEEDING MATERIALS IN UNITED STATES V. TRUMP MEMORANDUM OPINION Conrad Smith and six other current or former U.S. Capitol Police Officers have sued President Donald J. Trump and a host of other individuals and entities for their alleged role in instigating the January 6 attack. See Smith v. Trump, No. 21-2265, ECF No. 89 (Am. Compl.), ¶¶ 1, 11–45, 166–221 (D.D.C. Dec. 3, 2021). These Officers claim that they have been stymied in obtaining…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. BaggotSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. In Re Motions of Dow Jones & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API