Legal Opinion

Lafontant v. Coolidge-CLK St. Germaine, LLC

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided October 3, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02536Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ROBENSON LAFONTANT, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff VERSUS NO. 24-2536 COOLIDGE-CLK ST. GERMANE, LLC., SECTION: “E” (4) ET AL., Defendants ORDER AND REASONS The Court ordered Pius A. Obioha, counsel for Plaintiff Robenson Lafontant (“Plaintiff”), to appear to show cause as to why he should not be sanctioned for his failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)(2). Specifically, Mr. Obioha signed and filed a Memorandum in Opposition1 to a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment2 filed by Defendants Coolidge-CLK St. Germaine, LLC,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Snow Ingredients, Incorporated v. SnoWizardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  3. Park v. KimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  4. Bennie Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc., Kmart Corporation v. Paul S. MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  5. Miller v. Housing Authority of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API