Hausenfluck v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
Argued at Staunton, decided at Richmond. Error to judgment of circuit court of Shenandoah county, rendered June 25th, 1888, refusing a writ of error to a judgment of the county court of said county, rendered at its April term, 1888, sentencing Siram E. Hausenfluck to confinement in the penitentiary for the period of two years, he having been found guilty on an indictment for a felony. Opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtLacy, J.
The case is as follows : The plaintiff in error was indicted, tried and convicted in the county court of Shenandoah county at the April term, 1888, for the seduction of Mary Alice Rinker, a girl under twenty-one years of age, of a previous chaste character. At the trial he was found guilty by the jury, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary. Several exceptions were taken during the trial, and, after a verdict, a motion was made to set it aside and grant the accused a new trial, which motion the court overruled; whereupon the plaintiff in error applied for a writ of error to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kane v. PeopleCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
- People v. RyndersNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- People v. GatesNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Dowdy v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1852
3Cited by14 opinions
- Allen v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- State v. RingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- Mills v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Benson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- People v. . KearneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.