Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 21, 2021No. Criminal No. 2013-0067Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 13-67 (BAH) GARFIELD M. TAYLOR, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On October 20, 2020, this Court denied defendant Garfield M. Taylor’s third Rule 60(b) motion, which sought to reopen his habeas proceedings on the basis that he was improperly denied additional discovery that would have substantiated his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Taylor (“Taylor II”), Crim. Action No. 13-67 (BAH), 2020 WL 6146787, at *1, *6 (D.D.C. Oct.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Burton v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API