Legal Opinion

Birmingham Electric Co. v. Putman

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1926No. 6 Div. 820PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The complaint in this ease contains two counts, one charging assault and battery, and the other charging that defendant’s servants wrongfully ejected plaintiff from a street car operated by defendant in the city of Birmingham, both counts claiming damages.

The only evidence in the record tending to show an assault, or an assault and battery, isi that of the plaintiff, and his witness, Mrs. Hanners, and the two do not materially differ. Plaintiff testified:

“He (the conductor) drug me off the seat, and I walked up to the door, and the motorman opened the door, and taken me by the arm and pushed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Montgomery Traction Co. v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. YieldingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Birmingham Ry., L. & P. Co. v. SmithAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Birmingham Electric Co. v. PutmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API