Morgan v. Howard
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
HUNSTEIN, Presiding Justice.
Appellant J. Robert Morgan, in his capacity as the administrator of the estate of W L. Sheffield, 1 brings this appeal from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict finding that appellee Joe Robert Howard is the virtually adopted son of Sheffield. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
1. Virtual adoption is an equitable remedy utilized when the conduct of the parties creates an implied adoption without a court order. See Crawford v. Wilson, 139 Ga. 654, 658 (78 SE 30) (1913). An appeal in which the substantive issue involves the legality or propriety of a trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crawford v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Summerlot v. Crain-Daly Volkswagen, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Handley v. LimbaughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Rhodes v. QuantrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Lee v. GurleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Meinhardt v. ChristiansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Sanders v. RileySupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Johnson v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.