Legal Opinion

Ex parte Murphy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Ai3plioatioN to this court for writ of Habeas Corjyus, the same having been refused by lion. Tiios. L. FeazuR, Judge of Probate of Lee county. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This was an application by habeas corpus, sued out by the father, to obtain possession of his infant male child, about twenty months old. The child is in the possession of his maternal grandmother, with whom he was left by his dying mother, then living apart from her husband. The judge of probate denied relief, and left the child with his grandmother. The present is an appellate application, to obtain a review and reversal of the probate judge’s ruling. The writ was sued out*before the probate judge, November 27th, 1883, and was heard by him a few days afterwards, on oral proofs.

About July or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nooe's v. Garner's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Brinster v. ComptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Ex parte BoazSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kirkbride v. HarveySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  2. Sawyer v. LawrenceAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API