Legal Opinion

Harrisburg Pipe Bending Co. v. Welsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, The Harrisburg Pipe Bending Company (Limited), from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 1st day of November, 1897, vacating and setting aside an order of arrest .

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

The complaint in this action alleges that the defendant purchased certain goods of the Harrisburg Pipe Bending Company (Limited) to the amount of $742.21, $100 of which has been paid, and “ on information and belief that the defendant herein was guilty of a - fraud in the purchase of said goods and in contracting or incurring said liability, and that he- has, since the making of the contract, removed and disposed of his property with intent to defraud his creditors.” The arrest was made under the provisions of section 549 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and, upon a motion to set…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morris v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Nichols v. . PinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Phœnix Iron Co. v. Vessels " Hopatcong " & " Musconetcong"New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Pinckney v. DarlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mann v. ChrestopulosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Pier Bro's v. DohenyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Fitchard v. DohenyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API