Legal Opinion
Jawad v. Barnhart
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 13, 2005No. 04CV0246BTMBLMPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
On November 23, 2004, the Court granted Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and found that Plaintiff is disabled and .entitled to social security benefits. The Court concluded that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), upholding the Commissioner’s denial of benefits, was erroneous and not supported by substantial evidence in the record. On February 15, 2005, Plaintiff timely filed a motion for attorney’s fees. 1 The government contends that the amount of attorney’s fees…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jensen v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018
- Parrott v. ShulkinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Porter v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hamblen v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
- Debra Chapin v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.