Legal Opinion

Lewin v. Proehl

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 14, 1941No. 32,980PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

In this action to recover for services rendered under contract the verdict was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the order denying his- alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

Defendant, as trustee, is liquidating Proehl & Lewin, Inc., which will be referred to as the corporation. For it plaintiff’s services were rendered. The contract upon which he stands was made, if at all, by defendant as president and general manager of the corporation. The latter had been in business for some time before 1932. The corporation’s only stockholders were plaintiff, defendant, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glassberg v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. Bathrick v. Detroit Post & Tribune Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Schlick v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Chrysler v. Randolph Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Harmon v. Central Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Miller v. Wick Building Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. HinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Stanley Trucking Co. v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. In re the Condemnation of Certain Lands ex rel. City of White Bear Lake Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API