Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Strauss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We reject the husband’s contention that the temporary maintenance award was excessive. Based upon a review of the instant record, which consists of conflicting affidavits, we see no reason to substitute our discretion for that of the Supreme Court, which gave due consideration to all the relevant factors. In view of the wife’s reasonable needs, the standard of living enjoyed by the parties, the husband’s earnings, and the wife’s income and limited liquid assets, the temporary maintenance award was not excessive (see, Cohen v Cohen, 129 AD2d 550; Chosed v Chosed, 116 AD2d 690; Stern v Stern,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Stern v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Cohen v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Wolfe v. WolfeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Chosed v. ChosedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. May v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Youshah v. YoushahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API