Legal Opinion
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Bates Expanded Steel Truss Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 21, 1924No. 3PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, District Judge,
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company instituted this suit at law against Bates Expanded Steel Truss Company. The defendant demurred to each count of the declaration. The demurrer remains undisposed of and unargued. The plaintiff, relying upon R. S. §§ 863, 864, and 865 (Comp. St. §§ 1472-1474), has given notice to the defendant that it will take the depositions de bene esse of certain named persons at a specified time and place. The defendant moves that the notice be vacated upon the ground that the pleadings tender no issue of fact to which any testimony might or cbuld be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Platner v. . PlatnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Flower v. MacGinnissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
- Stevens v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1900
- Audiffren Refrigerating Mach. Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1917
- Lowrey v. KuswormU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wyuta Cattle Co. v. ConnellWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Sharaiha v. HoyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
- Realty Construction Co. v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Levy v. Frederick M. Kirby & Fremkir Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937