Legal Opinion
Schuster v. Constantine
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 25, 1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order uunanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Approximately 17 months after the filing of a note of issue and statement of readiness, defendant moved on April 27, 1976 to compel disclosure of the names and whereabouts of certain witnesses whose identities the infant plaintiff, Cheryl Ann Schuster, had refused to divulge upon her examination before trial which was held on July 18, 1974. Special Term abused its discretion in granting defendant’s motion. It has been clearly announced that pretrial discovery may not be obtained after the filing and serving of a statement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Price v. BrodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Fuoco v. Boyle Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Riggle v. Buffalo General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Marchitelli v. Greco Sales & Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blondell v. MaloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. Pomeroy Real Estate Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Doll v. KleinklausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Giddens v. MoultrieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Alessi v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.